<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Delap Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NASDAQ Withdraws Proposed Rule Requiring Internal Audit Function</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-withdraws-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-withdraws-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Williams, CPA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to the nature of comments received from issuers, NASDAQ has withdrawn a proposed rule that would require listed companies to have an internal audit function. In February of 2013, NASDAQ proposed a rule that would require all listed companies &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-withdraws-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Due to the nature of comments received from issuers, NASDAQ has withdrawn a proposed rule that would require listed companies to have an internal audit function.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In February of 2013, NASDAQ proposed a rule that would require all listed companies to establish and maintain an internal audit function.  After receiving comments filled with concern surrounding the impact of the new rule, NASDAQ has decided to revisit the initial proposal.  In an effort to consider the feedback received, NASDAQ will review the comments, revise the rule, and resubmit it.  Although the initial proposed rule would align NASDAQ with the NYSE requirement, concerns are rooted in the heavy burden placed upon companies, particularly smaller issuers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read more about details surrounding the original proposed rule:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/">http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fnasdaq-withdraws-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function%2F&amp;title=NASDAQ%20Withdraws%20Proposed%20Rule%20Requiring%20Internal%20Audit%20Function" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-withdraws-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portland to Implement Sick Leave Law</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/portland-to-implement-sick-leave-law/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/portland-to-implement-sick-leave-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Padfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What you may have heard is true: the City of Portland will be requiring employers to provide sick leave as of January 1, 2014.  The sick leave law covers employees who work within the City of Portland, or who travel &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/portland-to-implement-sick-leave-law/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">What you may have heard is true: the City of Portland will be requiring employers to provide sick leave as of January 1, 2014.  The sick leave law covers employees who work within the City of Portland, or who travel to the City of Portland for work at least 240 hours in a calendar year.  For example, if you have at least 6 employees you are required to provide a minimum of one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked.  However if you have less than 6 employees you are required to provide a minimum of one hour of unpaid sick time for every 30 hours worked up to 40 hours.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Are you exempt from this law?</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Employers with more than six employees who already provide a minimum of 40 hours of paid time off are exempt.</li>
<li>Employers with less than six employees who already provide 40 hours of unpaid time off are also exempt from the sick leave law.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Therefore, if your company&#8217;s current policies meet the minimum standard then you do not need to change anything to comply with the new law.  Additionally, employers that are not Portland based are not exempt from the sick leave law if they have employees travelling into Portland for work at least 240 hours.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What does this mean for employers who are not exempt?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Take a look at your existing policies.  If your company does not meet the current minimum standards, consider a strategy to implement the change in 2014.  You will need to determine how to track their hours worked in the City for the accrual of leave.  Employees can use sick time for seeking their own care or for the care of a family member on either scheduled visits or in emergencies.  Employees are required to notify the employer before the start of their shift or as soon as practicable and are not required to find a replacement or work an alternative shift to make up time.  You will need to develop policies and procedures for employees to notify you if they are sick and determine how their work will be covered, which will probably vary by position within the company.  The city will be developing outreach resources in the coming months to educate employers and employees regarding the law, but now is the time to start thinking about its potential impact on your current company operations.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What are my next steps?</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Determine whether your current paid time off policies meet the current requirements</li>
<li>Develop communication process for potential leave time with employees</li>
<li>Review your budget to strategize ways to make room for the cost of paid sick leave</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fportland-to-implement-sick-leave-law%2F&amp;title=Portland%20to%20Implement%20Sick%20Leave%20Law" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/portland-to-implement-sick-leave-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negotiate Better Financing Terms For Your Business</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/negotiate-better-financing-terms-for-your-business/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/negotiate-better-financing-terms-for-your-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mattecheck, CPA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiating terms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upticks in the economy and more confidence in the marketplace are positive signs for businesses who seek to grow this year. Traditional financing options are more appealing as business owners achieve clarity and assurance about the future. Concurrently, banks are &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/negotiate-better-financing-terms-for-your-business/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Upticks in the economy and more confidence in the marketplace are positive signs for businesses who seek to grow this year. Traditional financing options are more appealing as business owners achieve clarity and assurance about the future. Concurrently, banks are willing to expand the scope of who they lend to and are seeking investment opportunities. This creates an optimal scenario for prospects to secure fixed term debt with attractive lines of credit. <strong>Read on for insights how to negotiate the best financing deal for your business.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">After a business has funded certain capital requirements, acquiring comfortable financing terms is integral to establishing a growth strategy. After the financing proposal has been assembled and a potential lender identified, a business owner should <strong>prepare to negotiate with a lender.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some points of negotiation can include:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>loan amount</li>
<li>interest rate</li>
<li>repayment schedule</li>
<li>collateral</li>
<li>guarantees</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Business owners are often required to be the guarantor of a loan to satisfy the bank’s strict lending guidelines. Be aware of the risks of guaranteeing a loan: your personal assets may be compromised and/or this could impede obtaining other credit. If you have sufficient collateral as a secondary repayment source, consider requesting the bank to eliminate or adjust the personal guarantee requirement.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Be bold and ask for a limited guarantee. Even if your lender is reluctant to accept a limited guarantee, have fortitude and persistence to negotiate a workable covenant for your business.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Here are covenants to be aware of that are potentially worth negotiating:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">1.  Minimum cash balance</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">2.  Minimum working capital ratio</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">3.  Acquisition of additional debt</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">4.  Dividend payout limitations</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">5.  Subordination of notes or advances</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Another<strong> point of negotiation is reporting requirements</strong>. When it’s time to demonstrate to your lender a strong balance sheet, a trusted CPA can be your advocate in this area. A full-blown <strong>audit</strong> is the maximum level of assurance a CPA firm provides. Audits are highly regarded by banks and have a price tag to match. If your company would like to save money on an annual audit, consider asking your lender if a <strong>review</strong> would suffice. Through inquiry and analysis, a competent CPA firm can generate a review for the bank, which may satisfy their needs and save you substantial money. Another option is to downgrade to <strong>compilation, </strong>which keeps even more money in your bank account. Simply ask your lender what you could do to abate to the next level.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Remember, the destiny of your business’s success will be determined by your vision and strength. Take the initiative to negotiate better financing terms and you may witness growth beyond your imagination.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Delap LLP is one of Portland’s largest local accounting firms, located in Lake Oswego, Oregon.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fnegotiate-better-financing-terms-for-your-business%2F&amp;title=Negotiate%20Better%20Financing%20Terms%20For%20Your%20Business" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/negotiate-better-financing-terms-for-your-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/different-2/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/different-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Siegel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go to any business school today and the professors will beat the concept of differentiation and competitive advantage into students’ heads.  Businesses become intensely focused on augmenting products &#38; services to ensure they are perceived as different.  Products &#38; services &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/different-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Go to any business school today and the professors will beat the concept of differentiation and competitive advantage into students’ heads.  Businesses become intensely focused on augmenting products &amp; services to ensure they are perceived as different.  Products &amp; services are tweaked and manipulated to make sure they’re different.  Consequently we have observed an explosion of brands and products, yet how different are they really?  The competitive treadmill has companies stuck in a rut looking over their shoulder responding to each competitive move.  The minute that the competition creates something remotely viable or attractive in the marketplace, the industry responds with imitations and “me too” goods.  The constant competitive responses slowly kill original creative thinking.  The incessant focus to be different while responding to competitive maneuvering only makes businesses more the same.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Ultimately, competitive advantage is lost when a business becomes distracted by “me too” responses.  Saying no, when the marketplace is saying yes, is different and difficult to do.  Tackling a challenge others think is not possible is different.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">*Youngme Moon of Harvard refers to these companies as “reverse brands.”  They take away something consumer expects, but in return gives them something more.  If you have not read her book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Different-Escaping-Competitive-Youngme-Moon/dp/0307460851"><em>Different</em></a>, it is a must read. The following companies some after of which have recognized and embraced their authenticity, which truly differentiates them from their peers:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>JetBlue</strong>: Though they stripped away free meal service, round trip discounts, and first class seating, they also provided plush leather seats, personal entertainment units on each seat back, and a promise to never bump a passenger.</li>
<li><strong>Google</strong>: In the midst of cluttered landing pages that were bigger, busier, &amp; better… Google stunned people with what it didn’t do.  Google’s home page was stripped down &amp; naked relative to the leader Yahoo with cutting edge search analytics technology.</li>
<li><strong>IKEA</strong>: When IKEA launched in the USA it had minimal variety of styles, virtually no shopping assistance, no shipping, &amp; no delivery.  While giving us less, IKEA also gives its customer something more: design, style, and value.</li>
<li><strong>In-N-Out Burger:</strong> 6 items on the menu, no children’s menu, no salads, no desserts… HOWEVER, every item is made from scratch with fresh ingredients.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It takes courage to stray from the herd.  It takes risk to break away from the pack.  Only when a business is courageous enough to shrug market norms and truly be different can true competitive advantage be earned.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">*Moon, Y. (2010). <em>Different</em>. New York, NW: Crown Publishing group.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Delap LLP is one of Portland&#8217;s largest local accounting firms, located in Lake Oswego, Oregon.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fdifferent-2%2F&amp;title=Different" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/different-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASDAQ Proposed Rule Requiring Internal Audit Function</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Williams, CPA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal audits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NASDAQ Proposed Rule Requiring Internal Audit Function On February 20, 2013, NASDAQ released information on its proposed rule to require listed companies to establish and maintain an internal audit function.  Under the proposed rule, companies would have the option to &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>NASDAQ Proposed Rule Requiring Internal Audit Function </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On February 20, 2013, NASDAQ released information on its proposed rule to require listed companies to establish and maintain an internal audit function.  Under the proposed rule, companies would have the option to outsource this function to a third party service provider other than its independent external auditor.  The audit committee would be required to meet regularly with the internal auditor and assist the Board of Directors in overseeing the performance of the internal audit function.  The audit committee should also discuss the responsibilities with the external auditor, budget, and staffing of the internal audit function.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is currently reviewing comments on the proposed rule, and a final decision is expected before the end of the second quarter.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If passed, companies listed on NASDAQ on or before June 30, 2013 will be required to establish an internal audit function by no later than December 31, 2013.  Companies listed after June 30, 2013 must establish this function prior to listing.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We can help:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Reach out to a Delap professional to start a conversation on the proposed rule, and stay tuned for more resources on this topic.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Delap LLP is one of Portland&#8217;s largest local accounting firms specializing in tax, audit, and financial consulting, located in Lake Oswego, Oregon.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Read the full SEC release at <a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nasdaq/2013/34-69030.pdf">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nasdaq/2013/34-69030.pdf</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fnasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function%2F&amp;title=NASDAQ%20Proposed%20Rule%20Requiring%20Internal%20Audit%20Function" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/nasdaq-proposed-rule-requiring-internal-audit-function/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use Discipline to Drive Your Profits</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/why-greatness-needs-discipline-to-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/why-greatness-needs-discipline-to-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Siegel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every parent has heard their child whine “but that’s not fair” to which parents throughout generations have responded, “life is not fair.”  Unexpected events occur all the time.  Some surprises leave us in a better place.  People are quick to &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/why-greatness-needs-discipline-to-survive/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every parent has heard their child whine “<em>but that’s not fair</em>” to which parents throughout generations have responded, “<em>life is not fair</em>.”  Unexpected events occur all the time.  Some surprises leave us in a better place.  People are quick to pride-fully explain how they are responsible for the sudden success.  Yet, the same people deflect responsibility when an unexpected event has a negative impact.  It simply is not their fault.  Despite being years older, often our response to “bad luck” events is still to waive the victim flag and cry “<em>but that’s not fair</em>.”</p>
<p>My strength coach on the Oregon football team, Jim Radcliffe, practiced the simple mantra, “<em>no excuses</em>.”  As an eighteen year old, I did not fully appreciate the implications of embracing this principle would have on my life.  When a car accident created an unexpected traffic delay one day during my freshman year, I showed up a few minutes late for a weight lifting session.  The first words out of my mouth were, <em>“I’m sorry I’m late coach, there was traffic</em>.”  Coach Radcliffe without a second thought rejected the excuse.  “<em>You’re not a victim.  You decided when to leave for practice</em>.”  I ended up running Autzen stadium the following morning at 5:45 AM with my coach.</p>
<p>Great businesses often do not possess better strategy, rather they possess cultures of accountability and simply execute better than their peers.  Though business failures often involve extenuating circumstances and shared fault, the great businesses have leaders who take responsibility for the results.  Energy is not wasted pointing fingers.  By not entertaining excuses, these business leaders empower people to take ownership of their behaviors and their results.  It is subtle, but a culture of excuses position people as powerless victims of circumstance.  It robs people of the knowledge that they influence their own life in radical ways every day.</p>
<p>We don’t get to choose all the opportunities that come our way, but we do get to choose the way we respond to them.  Life is not always fair.  Winston Churchill once said, “The price of greatness is responsibility.”  Great business leaders take responsibility for their execution.  Accepting responsibility for personal failure in business is incredibly difficult, yet is often a sign of a powerful leader.</p>
<p>What’s the last business failure you took responsibility for and how did it ultimately help your team or organization?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fwhy-greatness-needs-discipline-to-survive%2F&amp;title=Use%20Discipline%20to%20Drive%20Your%20Profits" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/why-greatness-needs-discipline-to-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Domestic Production Activities Deduction (DPAD)</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/understanding-domestic-production-activities-deduction-dpad/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/understanding-domestic-production-activities-deduction-dpad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Wallis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax deductions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it? Domestic Production Activities Deduction, otherwise known as DPAD, was enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (code section 199).  With the purpose of providing a deduction for U.S. businesses, it simultaneously offset the &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/understanding-domestic-production-activities-deduction-dpad/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>What is it?<br />
</strong>Domestic Production Activities Deduction, otherwise known as DPAD, was enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (code section 199).  With the purpose of providing a deduction for U.S. businesses, it simultaneously offset the repeal of a tax break for U.S. exporters. This deduction is allowed for both regular tax and alternative minimum tax (AMT) purposes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Who is it available to?</strong><br />
Contrary to the history of its predecessor tax provisions, the DPAD is available to taxpayers who do not export.  This includes individuals, both C and S corporations, cooperatives, estates, and trusts.  Additionally, beneficiaries of an estate or trust and patrons of farming cooperatives can be allocated a share of the DPAD for each entity.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>What does it mean for you?</strong><br />
Most simply put – the DPAD allows a deduction of 9% of the total net income from eligible activities (phased in from 3% &#8211; 9% over the first five years it was in place).  This is the economic equivalent to a 3% reduction in tax rate on eligible activities.  For example a tax rate of 22% on a business for eligible activities in a given year would effectively become 19%. But keep in mind that the deduction for any year cannot exceed the taxpayer&#8217;s taxable income (or for individuals, cannot exceed adjusted gross income).  Further, the DPAD is limited to 50% of the Form W-2 wages paid out to employees in the eligible activities.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>What activities qualify as eligible for the DPAD?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manufacturing based in the U.S.</li>
<li>Selling, leasing, or licensing U.S. based manufactured items</li>
<li>Selling, leasing, or licensing U.S. produced motion pictures</li>
<li>U.S. construction services (this includes building and renovation of residential as well as commercial real estate)</li>
<li>Professional services including engineering and architectural which relate to U.S.-based construction projects</li>
<li>US based software development (including video games)</li>
<li>Wholesale processing and preparation of food products (not eligible at the retail level)</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Delap LLP is one of Portland&#8217;s largest local accounting firms, specializing in tax, audit, and consulting, located in Lake Oswego, Oregon.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Funderstanding-domestic-production-activities-deduction-dpad%2F&amp;title=Understanding%20Domestic%20Production%20Activities%20Deduction%20%28DPAD%29" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/understanding-domestic-production-activities-deduction-dpad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Ways to Improve Your 401(k) Plan</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/10-ways-to-improve-your-401k-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/10-ways-to-improve-your-401k-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[401(k) plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefit plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefit plan audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary benchmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Greater employee participation: Frequent and effective communication with participants empowers them to take ownership of their own retirement.  Do you wish your plan had greater participation rates? The best plans often include plan features involving automatic enrollment with opt-out &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/10-ways-to-improve-your-401k-plan/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ol>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong style="color: #000000;">Greater employee participation</strong><span style="color: #000000;">: </span></span><span style="color: #000000;">Frequent and effective communication with participants empowers them to take ownership of their own retirement.  Do you wish your plan had greater participation rates? The best plans often include plan features involving automatic enrollment with opt-out as well as stepped up contributions. Additionally, plans with active investment advisers</span><span style="color: #000000;"> who are committed to educating your workforce will often have much higher participation rates.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Hire an expert</strong>: Company executives and administrators are busy and pulled in many directions.  The Department of Labor (DOL) recognizes the need for plans to hire experts if they do not possess the needed expertise.  Great plans know that financial incentives influence behavior and ultimately the advice rendered, so understand how your adviser is paid (fee vs. commission).</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Improved performance through reduced fees</strong>: The historical lack of fee transparency has enabled many financial institutions to monetarily capitalize on the 401(k) market.  Every basis point of fee reduction is redirected into the employees’ accounts and is compounded year after year.  With recent changes in rules requiring more transparency, plan sponsors are able to more easily compare their plans&#8217; fees to potential other providers. Furthermore, nearly every fee is negotiable and most businesses can obtain the exact same plan with reduced fees.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Decreased staff time</strong>: Administrative expenses are a hidden cost some companies overlook when evaluating their 401(k) plan.  Great plans reduce the time administrators spend keeping up with compliance and plan management by the use of a third-party administrator (TPA). While a TPA has a cost, it may be less than the hidden costs of utilization of internal resources. And because they are experts, oftentimes, they will be able to identify compliance issues and provide you with solutions to such challenges.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><strong style="color: #000000;">Reduce plan sponsor liability: </strong><span style="color: #000000;">Obtain in writing a third party investment fiduciary.  A written third party investment fiduciary can significantly reduce the plan sponsor’s liability.  The fiduciary will monitor the plan, provide employee education, and evaluate overall performance among the funds.  Staying abreast of the rules and regulations that govern employee benefit plans is difficult in an ever-changing environment. Outsourcing this aspect to an expert will inevitably lower risk and liability that would otherwise be present.  Additionally, if your plan has more than 120 participants and requires an audit, select a firm with a deep level of employee benefit plan audit expertise.  1/3 of all employee benefit plans are audited by accounting firms that audit 2 or fewer plans per year.  Even if you have your plan audited by an accounting firm, if the DOL takes issue with the work that your auditor does or if they find issues with the operation of your plan, they can assesses fines to the plan sponsor, NOT the accounting firm.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Reduce plan overhead: </strong>Many of the 401(k) services are based upon number of eligible or participating plan participants.  As the number of participants and plan assets grow, companies can negotiate a reduced fee per employee.  Furthermore, great plans have a process to aid terminated employees with rolling over 401(k) funds into their new plan or an IRA.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Periodic course corrections:</strong> Great plans are constantly being evaluated, occasionally there will be opportunities to improve fund performance and administration.  The top employer 401(k) plans are willing to make the needed changes to ensure their employees are best served despite the status quo being the easiest option.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Lower your 401(k) fees: </strong>Being aware of aspects of your 401(k) plan that are subject to lower fees could save you money.  Funds that are passively managed, investments offered through a bundled program and funds with greater total assets are all associated with lower fees.  How does this relate to your 401(k)?  Find smart investments that do not require in depth research or maintenance, offer bundled investment programs to employees, and if you have greater assets, utilize them by using special funds or classes of stock in funds.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><strong style="color: #000000;">Avoid unnecessary fees:</strong> <strong style="color: #000000;"> </strong><span style="color: #000000;">What if you could avoid potential fees associated with your 401(k) plan?  Without compromising the value of your 401(k) plan, consider the following ways to avoid higher fees.  Choose funds that do not require active management by an investment adviser, steer away from offering optional features such as participant loan programs or insurance benefits under variable annuity contracts.  These aspects create additional fees that could otherwise be avoided.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Get an audit: </strong>Why should you audit your employee benefit plan? Beyond simply compliance, the process is a smart way to &#8220;cleanse&#8221; your plan to improve its quality, and relevance.  As a good rule of thumb, look for a firm that is registered with the AICPA&#8217;s audit quality center, and has a dedicated team of professionals focused on benefit plan audits. </span></li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>The US Department of Labor provides ten questions to ask yourself about your 401(k) plan:</strong></span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">What investment options are offered under your company’s 401(k) plan?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">Do you have all available documentation about the investment choices under your plan and the fees charged to your plan?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">What types of investment education are available under your plan?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">What arrangement is used to provide services under your plan (i.e., are any or all of the services or investment alternatives provided by a single provider)?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">Do you and other participants use most or all of the optional services offered under your 401(k) plan, such as a participant loan program and insurance coverage?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">If administrative services are paid separately from investment management fees, are they paid for by the plan, your employer or are they shared?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">Are the investment options tracking an established market index or is there a higher level of investment management services being provided?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">Do any of the investment options under your plan include sales charges (such as loads or commissions)?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">Do any of the investment options under your plan include any fees related to specific investments, such as 12b-1 fees, insurance charges, or surrender fees, and what do they cover?</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #000000;">Does your plan offer any special funds or special classes of stock (generally sold to larger group investors)?</span></li>
</ol>
<p><em>*&#8221;A Look at 401(k) Plan Fees&#8221;.  October 2010. United States Deparment of Labor. Retrieved from </em><em><a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/401k_employee.html#salescharges">http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/401k_employee.html#salescharges</a></em></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Still have more questions? Reach out to your CPA to learn more. </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Delap LLP is one of Portland&#8217;s largest local tax, audit, and consulting accounting firms, located in Lake Oswego, Oregon.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2F10-ways-to-improve-your-401k-plan%2F&amp;title=10%20Ways%20to%20Improve%20Your%20401%28k%29%20Plan" id="wpa2a_16"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/10-ways-to-improve-your-401k-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is blatantly wrong advice impacting your generosity?</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/is-blatantly-wrong-advice-impacting-your-generosity/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/is-blatantly-wrong-advice-impacting-your-generosity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave DeLap, CPA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am seeing a consistent theme of blatantly wrong advice coming in the form of commentary on the most recent tax legislation. There is a lot of commentary centering on the Pease Provision which is purported to be a limitation &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/is-blatantly-wrong-advice-impacting-your-generosity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I am seeing a consistent theme of blatantly wrong advice coming in the form of commentary on the most recent tax legislation.  There is a lot of commentary centering on the Pease Provision which is purported to be a limitation or phase out of itemized deductions.  In reality this is simply a disguised tax increase of roughly 1% (3% phase out multiplied by a 39.6% tax rate equals 1%).  A recent article I read stated “the Pease Provision phases out the income tax deduction for a charitable gift by the lesser of (i) 3% of the excess of AGI over the threshold level or (ii) 80% of the otherwise allowable deductions.”  This is very misleading by indicating the adjustment is somehow connected to the charitable donation.  The limitation is a factor of one’s Adjusted Gross Income, not a factor of one’s itemized deductions.  It does contain an 80% of overall itemized deductions test, but when the taxpayer has other itemized deductions such as mortgage interest, property taxes, and state income taxes, the 80% test is not limiting in most cases.  Taxpayers should look at this as an addition to taxable income since it is a factor of income.  If you receive a $100,000 bonus, your taxable income will increase by $103,000.  If conversely you give an additional $100,000 to charity, you will see a reduction in taxable income of $100,000.  In my volunteer work I am part of a generosity movement.  My fear is misinformation like this may serve to reduce charitable giving.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2Fis-blatantly-wrong-advice-impacting-your-generosity%2F&amp;title=Is%20blatantly%20wrong%20advice%20impacting%20your%20generosity%3F" id="wpa2a_18"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/is-blatantly-wrong-advice-impacting-your-generosity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 Automobile Depreciation Limits</title>
		<link>http://delapcpa.com/blog/2013-automobile-depreciation-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://delapcpa.com/blog/2013-automobile-depreciation-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mattecheck, CPA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://delapcpa.com/blog/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the IRS issued the 2013 inflation adjustments to depreciation limitations and lease inclusion amounts. The 50% first-year bonus depreciation will apply to only some automobiles, ultimately affecting the depreciation limitations. Because bonus depreciation is only relevant to the &#8230; <a href="http://delapcpa.com/blog/2013-automobile-depreciation-limits/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the IRS issued the 2013 inflation adjustments to depreciation limitations and lease inclusion amounts. The 50% first-year bonus depreciation will apply to only some automobiles, ultimately affecting the depreciation limitations. Because bonus depreciation is only relevant to the first tax year, these limitations are fixed values in the following years. What does this inflation adjustment mean for you?</p>
<p>Click <a title="IRS 2013 Automobile Depreciation Limits" href="http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/News/20137462.htm" target="_blank">HERE</a> for more details</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fdelapcpa.com%2Fblog%2F2013-automobile-depreciation-limits%2F&amp;title=2013%20Automobile%20Depreciation%20Limits" id="wpa2a_20"><img src="http://delapcpa.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://delapcpa.com/blog/2013-automobile-depreciation-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
